By Carl Cohen

Racial personal tastes are one of the so much contentious concerns in our society, referring to basic questions of equity and the correct function of racial different types in executive motion. Now modern philosophers, in a full of life debate, lay out the arguments on either side. Carl Cohen, a key determine within the collage of Michigan ideally suited proceedings, argues that racial personal tastes are morally wrong--forbidden by means of the 14th modification to the structure, and explicitly banned via the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He additionally contends that such personal tastes damage society more often than not, harm the colleges that use them, and undermine the minorities they have been meant to serve. James P. Sterba counters that, faraway from being banned via the structure and the civil rights acts, affirmative motion is de facto mandated by means of legislations within the pursuit of a society that's racially and sexually simply. an analogous Congress that followed the 14th modification, he notes, handed race-specific legislation that prolonged reduction to blacks. certainly, there are lots of sorts of affirmative action--compensation for earlier discrimination, remedial measures aimed toward present discrimination, the warrantly of diversity--and Sterba studies the splendid complaints that construct a constitutional beginning for every. Affirmative motion, he argues, favors certified minority applicants, now not unqualified ones. either authors supply concluding touch upon the collage of Michigan instances determined in 2003. part a century after Brown v. Board of schooling, concerns bearing on racial discrimination proceed to grip American society. This penetrating debate explores the philosophical and criminal arguments on each side of affirmative motion, but additionally finds the passions that force the problem to the leading edge of public lifestyles.

Show description

Read Online or Download Affirmative Action and Racial Preference: A Debate (Point Counterpoint) PDF

Best social policy books

Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective

This e-book presents an account of the present realizing of social capital. It covers either theoretical and empirical stories, and the concept that is debated all through. additionally incorporated during this quantity is the vintage 1987 article by means of the past due James Coleman, 'Social Capital within the production of Human Capital', which shaped the foundation for the improvement of social capital as an organizing inspiration within the social sciences.

State and Society in the Philippines (State and Society in East Asia)

Humans within the Philippines oftentimes vote, run for workplace, arrange social hobbies, and contact for reliable governance through the country. Why, then, is there a routine state-society hassle within the Philippines? One horn of the quandary is the chronic lack of ability of the country to supply uncomplicated companies, warrantly peace and order, and foster fiscal improvement.

President Johnson's war on poverty: rhetoric and history

Analyzes the good fortune or failure of the antipoverty courses when it comes to their very own discourse.

Crime and Social Justice

This publication provides a suite of a few of the easiest articles from the 1st ten problems with the magazine. The publication comprises vital discussions of highway crime, rape, delinquency, girl crime and imprisonment, in addition to greatly acclaimed contributions on criminological theorizing. The authors are, or were, participants of the editorial collective of Crime and Social Justice, and feature taught criminology on the collage of California, Berkeley.

Extra resources for Affirmative Action and Racial Preference: A Debate (Point Counterpoint)

Example text

40 Why Race Preference Is Wrong and Bad know. Whichever the race favored by some discriminatory policy, the policy itself is morally intolerable; no studies or scholarship aiming to persuade us of its educative benefits can make it acceptable. (5) Race Preference Cannot Be Justified by the Need for Outreach To overcome the racism that has long pervaded American society we have a duty to insure that persons of all races and ethnicities have genuine and equal opportunities in all spheres of social life.

This matter is morally settled: in dealings with the state, persons may not be preferred because of their race, or color, or religion, or sex, or national origin. ) in their private lives. But private opinions, however detestable, are not public business. Under rules to be enforced by our body politic, bigotry is forbidden. Persons of all colors, religions, and origins are equals with respect to their rights, equals in the eyes of the law. And equals must be treated equally. Race and nationality simply cannot serve, in our country, as the justification for unequal treatment.

If you were a minority applicant, you had a lower standard to meet and you went to a separate admission committee. ” See Dallas Morning News, 10 January 2002. Race Preference Is Morally Wrong 29 Overinclusiveness was unavoidable because racial categories are exceedingly crude, far too blunt to do justice. “Set-asides” for minority contractors also illustrate this crudity. To compensate for past discrimination against minority contractors in the City of Richmond, Virginia, the City Council reserved 30 percent of all city contracts for minority-owned firms.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.87 of 5 – based on 47 votes